Http://www.vg.no/nyheter/utenriks/jordskjelv-i-japan/bilder.php

 

Http://www.vg.no/nyheter/utenriks/jordskjelv-i-japan/bilder.php

is not relevant enough to seiches to warrant a link on seiche article. The lack of a solid connection is even explained on

According to that article, the pronunciation bears only a passing similiarity, about as much as the English words "which" and "was" bear to each other. Anyone here have a better way of rephrasing this, or should the link just be removed entirely as an irrelevancy? Rhialto 06:02, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Informationwise, this is a very good article. The problem is that it lacks inline references, which is one of the GA criteria nowadays. Once it gets inline references, it can easily be upgraded to B class, and submitted for GAC. Thegreatdr ( talk ) 05:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC)